I recently gave a presentation at Central Saint Martins College of Art and Design on a topic entitled "Is creativity management an oxymoron?"
The essential confusion to people resistant to the idea of "creativity management" was the word "management." Replace it with the word "optimization" and the resistance disappears; all we're really trying to do is optimize the quality of the idea pool and optimize the implementation process.
Then you can suggest that most people already implicitly accept the idea of creativity management: if you ask them to solve a problem or engage in a particular endeavour, one of the things they're likely to do is herd people into a room with a flip chart and conduct some sort of brainstorming session and implicit in that action is the acceptance that certain methods, processes and procedures enhance creative output.
Then you can begin discussing how to improve the enormous amount of creative output people generate, from problem solving in everyday business life right up to the level or art.
***
TIP OF THE DAY: SOME IDEAS ARE BETTER THAN OTHERS
One of the useful methods of valuing ideas is to compare the type of idea with those types of ideas that have previously been most successful.
Franklin (2003) notes that some kinds of ideas are more successful than others. He notes six types:
a) Need spotting – involves actively finding an answer to a problem.
b) Solution spotting – involves finding a problem for a solution.
c) Market Research – ideas generated as a result of market research.
d) Random event – moments of serendipity when people stumble across answers they weren't looking for.
e) Mental invention – pure random ideas with no previous knowledge of how they may be implemented.
f) Trend following.
Of these, the random event was the most successful (92.9%) with least failures (7.1%). However, this type of idea requires previous knowledge or experience on some level – for example, an individual who has worked in an environment previously may utilise that tacit knowledge to solve a problem that becomes evident later.
Very close to the above is solution spotting with an 87.5% success and a 12.5% failure rate. Again, this idea type requires previous knowledge: the innovator consciously seeks a problem to apply that knowledge to.
***
If you haven't already done so, you can buy the MBA Research Project on Managing Creativity and Innovation, DIY Audit, Good Idea Generator software and the 50 slide Powerpoint Presentation from http://www.managing-creativity.com
Best
http://www.managing-creativity.com
_________
